Law School Exam Strategy: Issue-Spotting, IRAC, and Time Management

Law School Exam Strategy: Issue-Spotting, IRAC, and Time Management

Written by the GPAI Team (STEM Expert)
Law school exams are unlike anything you've experienced before. They test issue-spotting, legal analysis, and time management under extreme pressure. A typical exam gives you 3-4 hours to analyze complex fact patterns and write thoughtful essays. Success requires not just knowledge, but exam-taking strategy. Here's how to approach law school exams like a pro.

Understanding Law School Exams

Format

Most law school exams consist of:
  • Essay questions (75-90%): Long fact patterns requiring issue-spotting and IRAC analysis
  • Short answer (10-20%): Brief rule statements or case applications
  • Multiple choice (varies): Some professors include MC questions

What Professors Test

Law school exams test three skills: 1. Issue-spotting: Can you identify all legal issues in a fact pattern? 2. Rule knowledge: Do you know the black letter law? 3. Analysis: Can you apply law to facts and argue both sides?

Most important: Analysis. Professors care more about how you think than what you conclude.

The IRAC Method

IRAC is the foundation of law school exam writing.

Issue

Identify the legal question raised by the facts.

Example: "Does a contract exist between A and B?"

Tips:

  • Frame as a question
  • Be specific (not "contract issue" but "was there valid acceptance?")

Rule

State the applicable legal principle.

Example: "A contract requires offer, acceptance, and consideration. Acceptance must be a mirror image of the offer under the common law."

Tips:

  • State the general rule first
  • Then state sub-rules and exceptions
  • Don't cite cases unless required by professor

Application/Analysis

Apply the rule to the facts. This is where you earn points.

Example: "Here, A offered to sell his car for $5,000. B responded, 'I'll pay $4,500.' This is a counteroffer, not acceptance, because it does not mirror the original offer. Therefore, no contract was formed at this point."

Tips:

  • Use the facts from the problem (cite them!)
  • Argue both sides if the issue is close
  • Explain why the rule applies or doesn't apply
  • Address counterarguments

Conclusion

Briefly answer the issue.

Example: "Therefore, no contract exists between A and B."

Tips:

  • Keep it short (1 sentence)
  • Don't introduce new analysis
  • It's okay to conclude "it depends" or "likely X, but possibly Y"

Time Management Strategy

Before the Exam

Know the exam format: How many questions? How much time per question? Open-book or closed-book?

Budget your time: If you have 3 hours and 3 questions, spend 50-55 minutes per question and reserve 15 minutes for proofreading.

During the Exam

Step 1: Read the fact pattern (15-20 minutes for a 1-hour question)

  • Read twice: Once for overall story, once to spot issues
  • Underline key facts
  • Note ambiguities or missing information
Step 2: Outline your answer (10-15 minutes)
  • List all issues you spotted
  • For each issue, jot down the rule and key facts
  • Decide the order (usually chronological or most important first)
Step 3: Write your answer (25-30 minutes)
  • Use IRAC for each issue
  • Write clearly and concisely
  • Don't skip issues because you're running out of time—hit every issue, even briefly
Step 4: Proofread (5 minutes)
  • Fix obvious typos
  • Ensure you answered the call of the question
  • Check that you addressed all issues

Time Management Pitfalls

Running out of time: The most common mistake. If you have 10 minutes left and 3 issues to cover, write brief IRAC paragraphs for each rather than skipping them entirely.

Spending too long on one issue: If an issue is taking too long, wrap it up and move on. Partial credit on all issues beats full credit on half the issues.

Issue-Spotting Techniques

How to Spot Issues

1. Look for legal "triggers" Certain facts signal legal issues:

  • Money changing hands → Contract formation, consideration
  • Physical contact → Battery, consent
  • Someone gets hurt → Negligence, causation
  • Promises made → Promissory estoppel, Statute of Frauds
2. Ask "Why is this fact in the problem?" Professors don't include irrelevant facts. If a fact seems random, it's probably triggering an issue.

Example: "A was drunk when he signed the contract." → Issue: Capacity to contract

3. Look for ambiguities When facts are unclear or missing, that's often an issue to discuss.

Example: "A told B he'd pay 'a fair price' for the work." → Issue: Definiteness of contract terms

4. Think chronologically and by party Walk through the fact pattern step-by-step and from each party's perspective.

Common Issues by Subject

Contracts:

  • Formation (offer, acceptance, consideration)
  • Defenses (Statute of Frauds, unconscionability, mistake, duress)
  • Performance and breach
  • Remedies (expectation, reliance, restitution)
Torts:
  • Intentional torts (battery, assault, false imprisonment, IIED)
  • Negligence (duty, breach, causation, damages)
  • Strict liability
  • Defenses (consent, self-defense, comparative fault)
Civil Procedure:
  • Personal jurisdiction
  • Subject matter jurisdiction
  • Pleadings (12(b)(6) motion, Rule 11)
  • Discovery
  • Summary judgment
Criminal Law:
  • Actus reus and mens rea
  • Accomplice liability
  • Defenses (insanity, self-defense, necessity)
  • Inchoate crimes (attempt, conspiracy, solicitation)

Analysis: Arguing Both Sides

Many issues don't have clear answers. Professors want to see you argue both sides.

Example issue: "Did A have a duty to rescue B?"

Argument 1 (Duty exists): "Under the special relationship exception, A may have had a duty to rescue B because A and B were in a business partnership, which creates a relationship of mutual dependence. Courts have recognized duties in similar contexts."

Argument 2 (No duty): "However, the general rule is no duty to rescue absent a special relationship. A business partnership may not rise to the level of relationships courts have recognized (parent-child, employer-employee in some contexts). Therefore, A likely had no duty."

Conclusion: "On balance, a court would likely find no duty, but the outcome depends on whether the jurisdiction recognizes business partnerships as creating special relationships."

Writing Tips

Clarity Over Elegance

Professors read hundreds of exams. Clear, concise writing stands out.

Good: "A contract requires offer, acceptance, and consideration. Here, A made an offer by stating specific terms. B accepted by saying 'I agree.' Consideration exists because both parties promised something of value."

Bad (too verbose): "In analyzing whether a contract was formed between the parties, one must first consider the foundational elements of contract law, which have been developed over centuries of common law jurisprudence and require, as a threshold matter, that there be an offer, an acceptance of that offer, and consideration flowing between the parties."

Use Headings

Headings help professors follow your analysis and ensure you hit all issues.

Example: `` I. Contract Formation A. Offer B. Acceptance C. Consideration

II. Defenses to Contract Enforcement A. Statute of Frauds B. Unconscionability ``

Cite Facts, Not Cases

Unless your professor specifically asks for case citations, focus on applying rules to facts.

Good: "Here, A's statement was definite because it specified the price, quantity, and delivery date."

Unnecessary: "Under Lonergan v. Scolnick, an offer must be sufficiently definite. Here, A's statement..."

Avoid Conclusory Statements

Don't just state conclusions—explain your reasoning.

Bad: "A is clearly liable for negligence."

Good: "A is likely liable for negligence because he owed a duty of care to pedestrians, breached that duty by texting while driving, and his breach caused B's injuries."

Practice Exams: The Secret to Success

Practice exams are the most important part of exam prep.

How to Practice

1. Take old exams under timed conditions Simulate the real exam. No pausing, no extra time.

2. Self-grade using the model answer Compare your answer to the professor's model. Did you spot all the issues? Was your analysis thorough?

3. Identify patterns After 2-3 practice exams, you'll notice recurring issues and professor preferences.

4. Revise your outline Adjust your outline based on what you missed on practice exams.

How Many Practice Exams?

Aim for 3-5 per class. Diminishing returns after that.

Final Tips

1. Read the call of the question carefully "Discuss A's potential claims" is different from "Will A prevail?" The first asks you to identify claims; the second asks for a conclusion.

2. Don't panic if you don't know something If you can't remember a specific rule, state the general principle and apply common sense.

3. Manage stress Exam anxiety is real. Practice mindfulness, get enough sleep, and remember: you know more than you think.

4. Trust your outline If you've outlined thoroughly, you have the tools to succeed. Trust your preparation.

Law school exams are tough, but they're learnable skills. With practice, strategy, and disciplined time management, you can excel.